NYSTCE English to Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL) Practice Test

What criticism is often directed at the Direct/Natural method of SLA?

1. Too much focus on grammar rules

2. Insufficient emphasis on comprehension input

3. Neglect of speaking opportunities

4. Overemphasis on written language

The correct answer is: Insufficient emphasis on comprehension input

The criticism directed at the Direct/Natural method of Second Language Acquisition (SLA) often highlights that it does not place enough emphasis on comprehension input. This method, which prioritizes immersion and natural communication, sometimes leads to situations where learners are not sufficiently exposed to graded or comprehensible input that effectively aids their understanding of the language as it progresses. In SLA, comprehensible input refers to language that learners can understand while still being exposed to new vocabulary and structures. Without a solid focus on ensuring that input is comprehensible, learners may struggle to make connections between language forms and meanings, which can hinder their overall language acquisition process. This lack of emphasis on gradually increasing the complexity of language input can lead to gaps in comprehension and limits the development of proficiency, particularly in more advanced language skills. By acknowledging this criticism, educators can take a more balanced approach that incorporates elements from various methods, ensuring adequate comprehension input while also providing opportunities for natural communication and immersion. Additionally, this awareness can help instructors design lessons that integrate targeted listening and reading materials that scaffold learners’ language development effectively.